Pricing Online Content: Fee or Free
Do good things
always come with a price tag? The advent of the internet in 1991 was accompanied
with the arrival of useful and meaningful content in abundance. That is still
the case today, with new websites coming up every day--blogs, webpages for
cooking fanatics, forums for techies, and whatnot. Businesses are well aware of
the fact that advertising on social networking sites, podcasts, live
broadcasts, etc. is imperative for growth and development. To lure in potential
customers, content with gold’s worth is given away for free. The question that
now arises is, should it really be distributed for free or a price should be
levied on the same? With millions of search results popping up when you turn to
a search engine for your requirements, it’s unlikely that you’ll pay to access
something which is available for free on some other site. It’s well noted that
top-notch companies who often tried to wall off their services behind
subscription charges have faced the wrath of the public. Take the case of
graduate students; it’s not often that a student pays dollars to access a
research paper. The same guy will prefer spending hours searching for free
alternatives rather than paying for it, albeit knowing that the purchase will
save him both time and effort. When publishers offer unrestricted access to
valuable content, they intentionally play with a double-edged sword—losing on
access/subscription fees they could have charged from readers while gaining
something of immeasurable worth, consumer behavior insights. When readers share
what they read with others via Twitter, Facebook, and similar platforms, not
only does it garner new customers for publishers and businesses, it also helps
analysts to decipher and formulate strategies to roll out more enticing content
for luring the intended target audience. At the same time, they can deliver
more value to advertisers and reap in higher remuneration.
The ‘pay v/s
free’ dilemma is akin to flipping an unbiased coin; the pro-pay crusaders
vocalize that sublime and first-rate journalism will perish unless paid for.
The other faction believes that professional journalists and content writers
should compete with other contenders all over the world for website hits.
Today’s generation has a blurred vision when it comes to what should or should
not be paid for in the online arena. Ask a youngster to purchase an album from
say, iTunes and you’re sure to get a blatant “no” for an answer. The
accompanying reasoning usually starts with, “Man, I can download the same for
free from xyz”. For them, words like copyright infringement and legitimacy are
non-existent. But blaming them isn’t right. Growing up in a world with
resources such as Google, an entry point to the world of free information, the
technology was and is available for people to use, and hence they never
hesitated in utilizing it.
However, if the
need of the hour requires purchase off the internet, consumers don’t think
twice. A case in point is LinkedIn, with the advantage of having a paid
subscription outweighing the default, free account. Companies go for the former
to leverage their interests and don’t mind paying a few dollars for the same;
it is their requirement at that instance which matters. Would you not purchase
the book directly from Amazon if hours of futile search results such as ‘xyz
free pdf download’ or ‘get xyz direct download’ don’t yield anything? With
changing times, businesses have become stringent in the process of rolling out
products. Authors and publishing houses are going to lengths previously
untouched to ensure that books aren’t pirated online. They don’t hang back in
taking legal measures, if needed. The music industry comprehended this and
deployed steps to fight piracy -- strong IP rights, pruning the web for pirated
content, redefining business models, and launching anti-piracy campaigns.
Taking a single
stance on the debate of “free or fee” is neither possible nor plausible. A lot
of factors are to be considered while settling with one out of the two. What,
when, how, and why are just a few among the numerous facets to be deliberated
on. Would you have paid to read this very piece of writing or simply open
another search result addressing the same topic for free? The choice depends on
you.
Comments